Видео

Hairdryer analogy was great

awesome

Your animations are awesome, Thank you from Thailand ขอบคุณครับ

This is proper funny

FWIW, you are the first subject matter expert I have found that was able to explain stimulated emission in a way that made it comprehensible! I have watched many videos that purported to explain the phenomenon and all failed to get it across to me. Your script & visuals are just right.

cool

Absolutely phenomenal video!! Great to see you back!

Wah!? 👺😱Lol!

very good video

I think this model only works for a circle, if we think of a sphere then the bulge created by the vectors will be everywhere i.e. 360 degrees. That is why we will think about the centrifugal force formed by the Moon-Earth couple where the barycenter is not in the center of the Earth.

Comes back with an absolutely amazing video. Love your content

glad to have u back!!

Hmm wonder why graphite can reflect neutrons...

What happens to the control rod's material as it keeps absorbing neutrons?

3 years waiting for the return!

I think I am the only one not understanding

This doesn't explain the different timing in tides of close-by areas or the extra long periods of high tide near Vancouver. It also does not explain the very small tides in the tropical area, where the incidence of Moon and Sun are stronger. Just doesn't explain the absence of tides in entire seas, like Baltic, Japan, Black sea, Agean... It doesn't explain tides

1:25 electricity move from positive to negative not negative to positive

Center of gravity between the earth moon system resides inside the earth a thousand miles or so in relation to where the moon is relative to earth . All water and other mass should be attracted to the centre of gravity. No?

❤❤

It’s a great youtube channel that comprise exact and complete physics details in it❤.

Hi, the animation is amazing. can you explain with what you are doing such animations. i am interested for pedagogical reasons !

So many videos get this wrong. You nailed it!

thats a cool cat

Type 2 super conductors would aid in perpetual motion energies, Possible precise heating and cooling magnets " Heating metals to precise temperatures interacting with super cooled magnets helping to expand and contract magnetic field potential " Creating exothermic endothermic magnetic reactions ". Opinions?

Another explanation is, " A super cooled magnet that is used as a super conductor is condensed metal from contraction of metal Inverting the magnetic poles of A magnet inward. ( Condensing fermions into bosons ) As the metal thaws from natural room temperature heat the bosons decompress into their original field states as fermions? What do you think? ( Cold contracts metals, Heat expands metal )

Why are your colors dyslexic. Protons are red electrons are blue. You're literally trying to confuse everyone.!!!

If Chernobyl is "uninhabitable" why is NATO squandering billions on a war of aggression against Russia and has a biological weapons lab in Caucasus region to conquer such a "bread basket" agricultural territory? Why did the United States during WWII pursue a nuclear blast at Trinity New Mexico when Oppenheimer originally suggested radiological against enemy controlled farmland and rail transit? "Astounding Sci FI" editor Charles Campbell was visited by WWII FBI agents only to respond "that explains why most of my subscribers have moved to Los Alamos". Matter in fact Oppenheimer's insistence on radiological was why he was selected to be a test engineer of what happened to Heisenberg's criticality pile in Leipzig to frustrate Hitler into selling off Uranium 235. Nonwestern nations do not tolerate pantywaist phobias about "nuclear" which had become a catchphrase of New York comic books and Hollywood films.

You can imagine the earth without water, water balances the shape of the earth, and its revolving or orbiting around its self, and the sun. Ebb and tide are considered as a safety vale for the earth, and its rotation. Earth with water slows its revolving... The water increased because of the melting of ice caps of polars and Himalayas, therefore the force of revolving increases too... NOW:The length of the year now is [ 365 1/4 +_(2 minutes )].... These studies had completed and sent on July 26th 2000... Yousif A Tobiya

Now, now, now...The Earth is more than 50,000 km away from the Moon, and is close to the Sun and the planets. Therefore, the Moon’s terrain cannot be seen with the naked eye like before...The Earth will be lost in the depths of infinite space... This phenomenon confirms my fifth theory (the earth has been lost in the depth of space)... Yousif A Tobiya

Abstract : The energy that dominates the earth is very great, some of it is natural, like the heat of the sun and volcanoes, and some of it is human action, by cutting down trees, without replacing them and cultivating in their place... There are five forces that control or dominate the planet... 1- The first theory (horizontal dynamic movement) and its end... The occurrence of storms, rain, floods and snow, at unexpected times and places, is because of the expiration of this theory, which needs to be balanced... 2- The second theory (vertical dynamic movement) and its end... This movement or force controls or dominates the earthquakes, earth cracks, drying up of rivers and lakes, earth openings, mountain collapses, and the emergence of drinking water springs on the ground... It becomes out of control... These phenomena increased due to the end of this theory... The third theory: it is water that rotates the earth... The fourth theory: the Earth's axis of rotation has tilted 2° degrees... The fifth theory: The Earth has a new orbit... These studies had completed and sent on July 26th 2000 YOUSIF A TOBIYA

Effect during gravity? Was Tesla right?

The tides on shore can be many feet high, but out in the open ocean, the water only rises between 9 to 12 inches max. It is the huge volume of water moving towards shore that makes high tides so high

If time moves that slow at the edge of a black hole, is there a place in space where time moves so slow you could watch the universe die in real time?

is this just a theory or the best sudgestion to date. there seems to be alot of conclusions based on what could be happening. or . the wavelength of light that enters the glass passes through to a space where the ruby crystal has a different effect on light than any other transparent mass. being red. so when the uv tries to get out the other side as a different wavelength. it can't.

Your wrong, it uses thermal energy, which disproves the kelvin Planck corollary.

So essentially, Nuclear Warheads wouldn't make an area completely uninhabitable for centuries due to radiation because the amount of radioactive materials in the bomb are relatively low, and the bomb is designed with the intent of burning through all of that radioactive material instantly to unleash all of the explosive energy at once, so the radiation doesn't last nearly as long (in fact, about 80% of the radioactive products in a nuclear warhead detonation would have already decayed within the 1st hour). What makes nuclear power plant disasters much worse from a long-term radiation exposure perspective is that you need a lot more fuel for it over a significantly longer period of time that isn't burned through instantly for one massive energy release like warheads. There's huge stores of radioactive material that don't get immediately used up, which is what actually allows the unhealthy radiation levels to linger for so long. Aside from the obvious hazard that is flattening an entire city, this actually makes nuclear warheads quite a bit less scary for me than I originally thought they were. My biggest fear when it came to nukes initially was the idea that the radiation would linger for multiple lifetimes and render the place where the detonation happened uninhabitable for hundreds of years unless you wanted to develop every form of cancer imaginable. Now that I know that the vast majority of the radiation from the blast would decay within hours, the city may be destroyed, but there's still the prospect of rebuilding and making the area habitable again within a significantly shorter time frame than I assumed would be the case initially.

Thank you for an informative video! I don't fully understand why the light coming out of a laser is coherent. "Stimulated emission" explains why an initial photon bouncing back-and-forth can accumulate a large number of coherent photons. But it seems like there would be countless "initial photons" all over the cavity, each accumulating their own, independent collections of photons. Why would the phase of any one group match other groups?

there is an element currently undiscovered that does 100% exist that once its liquidized it will fix it all.

Curious to know; what if the Moon would be like Earth and had liquid waters and ATMOSPHERE....what would happened ?!?

Nice but it seems like everyones explanation is a bit ambiguous around the pot so to speak and very simplistic,i would like to know the math and energy it takes to operate a laser and its output energy and its losses.this information seems very obscure because there is no video about it,not even MIT.what’s up with that?i would love to hear a clear explanation of the mathematical working principles.

Excellent vidéo !

this was the best. thanks

When the Little Boy exploded at Hiroshima, it did that a bit more than a 1/4 mile up. It did release a huge amount of radioactivity, but in only a small fraction of a second. The fireball did not touch the ground. If it had, a vast amount of radioactive debris would have been created. But at Chernobyl, when the reactor split open, it released a gigantic amount of radioactive material directly onto & into the ground. And it did that over several days. That is why the amount of radiation let go at Hiroshima is nothing compared to what got out at Chernobyl.

Does it mean after certain time it stops swinging

I recommend you don't go into teaching. I found it very hard to follow compared to other videos on the same subject.

👽Type 2 Superconductors: Type II Superconductors can conduct a continum of superconductivity by creating tiny magnetic vortices called I believe "Vortex-Crowding" stabilizing the field longevity of superconductivity.